• 여학생들이 Surgical domain으로 career 나아가기 어려운 이유를 Wenger Paradigmatic trajectories 활용하여 qualitative 하게 연구한 논문.
  • 학생은 의과대학 기간동안 보고(Seeing), 듣고(Hearing), 직접 (Doing, Hands-on experience) 경험을 통해서 자신의 미래 이미지를 그리고(Imagining), 과정을 통해 Career decision 한다.
  • Wenger 의하면... "학생들은 바보가 아니다의과대학 기간에 무엇을 듣든, 무엇을 배우든, 무슨 행위를 지시받든, 무슨 시험을 보든 실제 일이 이뤄지는 현장을 접하는 순간(actual access to the practice) 얼마 지나지 않아 진짜로 중요한 것이 무엇인지(what counts) 바로 알아챌 것이다."
    • Wenger29 describes the importance of ‘paradigmatic trajectories’, which are visible career paths provided by a community that shape how individuals negotiate and find meaning in their own experiences
      • ‘Exposure to this field of paradigmatic trajectories is likely to be the most influential factor shaping the learning of newcomers. In the end, it is its members – by their very participation – who create a set of possibilities to which newcomers are exposed as they negotiate their own trajectories. No matter what is said, taught, prescribed, recommended, or tested, newcomers are no fools; once they have actual access to the practice, they soon find out what counts.’29

  • Surgical world 속해 있을 자신의 모습을 그려보지 않았다는 것이 그것을 해보고자 하는 시도조차 하지 않았다는 것을 의미하지는 않는다. 앞서 언급된 과정을 통해 Surgical paradigmatic trajectories 대한 구분(strongly gendered)적인 이미지가 형성되며, '내가 과연 길을 있을까(paths of possibility)' 대한 의심도 저절로 계속된다(self-perpetuating). 무엇보다 여학생들이 외과계열 세상에 대해 가지고 있는 이미지를 형성할 있는 다른 방법이 없을 , 그들이 접하는 외과계열을 둘러싼 구분적인 담론(discourse) 더욱 공고해질 것이다.
    • Being unable to imagine belonging to the surgical world meant that these students did not even attempt to enter it. Surgical paradigmatic trajectories were strongly gendered, shaped by the processes we have outlined. The self-perpetuating power of these ‘paths of possibility’ was clear: the stories heard by students sustained the gendered discourses surrounding surgery, and the lack of any other avenues through which female students might form their perceptions of the surgical world left these discourses unchallenged.



 2013 Jun;47(6):547-56. doi: 10.1111/medu.12134.

The only girl in the room: how paradigmatic trajectories deter female students from surgical careers.

Source

School of Health Professions Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

Over 60% of UK medical students are female, yet only 33% of applicants to surgical training are women. Role modelling, differing educational experiences and disidentification in female medical students have been implicated in this disparity. We are yet to fully understand the mechanisms that link students' experiences with national trends in career choices. We employ a hitherto unused concept from the theory of communities of practice: paradigmatic trajectories. These are visible career paths provided by a community and are cited by Wenger as potentially the most influential factors shaping the learning of newcomers. We pioneer the use of this theoretical tool in answering the research question: How do paradigmatic trajectories shape female medical students' experiences of surgery and subsequent career intentions?

METHODS:

This qualitative study comprised a secondary analysis of data sourced from 19 clinical medical students. During individual, in-depth, semi-structured interviews, we explored these students' experiences at medical school. We carried out thematic analysis using sensitising concepts from communities of practice theory, notably that of 'paradigmatic trajectories'.

RESULTS:

Female students' experiences of surgery were strongly gendered; they were positioned as 'other' in the surgical domain. Four key processes - seeing, hearing, doing and imagining - facilitated the formation of paradigmatic trajectories, on which students could draw when making career decisions. Female students were unable to see or identify with other women in surgery. They heard about challenges to being a female surgeon, lacked experiences of participation, and struggled to imagine a future in which they would be successful surgeons. Thus, based on paradigmatic trajectories constructed from exposure to surgery, they self-selected out of surgical careers. By contrast, male students had experiences of 'hands-in' participation and were not marginalised by paradigmatic trajectories.

CONCLUSIONS:

The concept of the paradigmatic trajectory is a useful theoretical tool with which to understand how students' experiences shape career decisions. Paradigmatic trajectories within surgery deter female students from embarking on careers in surgery.

© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.






  • 어떤 종류의 경험이 학생들로 하여금 특정 과를 선호하게 하고, 특정 과를 기피하게 하는가?
    • 임상 경험이 학생들의 전공 선택에 영향을 준다는 것은 이미 알려져 있다.
  • )
    • 가지의 clerkship 모두에서 intrinsic work factor 대한 긍정적인 반응은 강력한 양성 예측자였다.
    • Acute patient, favorable orientation towards technology 대한 선호가 있다면 외과를 선호한다. (clerkship이전, 이후 모두). General practice 대한 선호는 반대 방향이다.
    • 성별과도 연관이 있어 보임.(However, specialty preferences reflected a certain genderrelated pattern, with men favouring surgery, women favouring general practice and both genders exhibiting equal degrees of inclination for internal medicine. )

 2008 Jun;42(6):554-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03008.x. Epub 2008 Apr 23.

The impact of clerkships on studentsspecialty preferences: what do undergraduates learn for their profession?

Source

Institute of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Clinical experiences and gender have been shown to influence medical studentsspecialty choices. It remains unclear, however, which aspects of experiences make students favour some specialties and reject others. This study aimed to clarify the effects of clerkships on specialtychoice and to identify explanatory factors.

METHODS:

We carried out a longitudinal cohort study to collect data on career preferences and attitudes towards future careers among 3 cohorts ofstudents before and after clerkships in surgery (n = 200), internal medicine (n = 277) and general practice (n = 184). Regression analyses were performed to identify the determinants of career choice and the role of gender.

RESULTS:

Exposure to clinical settings encourages students to opt for a career in the corresponding specialty. Men were more stimulated than women by the general practice clerkship. Gender had no clear role as a predictor of career preference. The major predictor of career choice in all 3 specialties was positive evaluation of work-intrinsic factors. A preference for working with acute patients and technology-oriented work, prestige orientation and insignificance of a controllable lifestyle were determinants of a preference for surgery. Students with a preference for general practice had almost opposite preferences. Those who chose internal medicine favoured a controllable lifestyle.

DISCUSSION:

Factors other than gender appear to drive specialty decisions. Work content, type of patients and lifestyle options play major roles. Consequently, along with teaching about the practice of medicine, the matching of specialty preferences with reality is an essential outcome ofclerkships.




+ Recent posts